I'm like a slipping glimpser

Abstract painter Willem de Kooning, talking about his practice  (Thanks to Jo V. who brought me this quote):

Each new glimpse is determined by many,

Many glimpses before.

It's this glimpse which inspires you -- like an occurrence.

And I notice those are always my moment of having an idea

That maybe I could start a painting.

....

Y'know the real world, this so-called the real world,

Is just something you put up with, like everybody else.

I'm in my element when I am a little bit out of this world:

then I'm in the real world -- I'm on the beam.

Because when I'm falling, I'm doing all right;

When I'm slipping, I say, hey, this is interesting!

It's when I'm standing upright that bothers me:

I'm not doing so good; I'm stiff.

As a matter of fact, I'm really slipping, most of the time,

into that glimpse. I'm like a slipping glimpser.

 

(Sketchbook 1: Three Americans, 1960)  

Observing flowers

On my friend's bookshelves, I found The Observer's Book of Wild Flowers and was immediately transported to childhood when I earnestly collected flowers. I would carefully place them between sheets of tissue paper inside heavy books so that they would dry out. Once flattened, I would stick them into my collection and label them. I'd look them up in the little green Observer's Book, read the descriptions and copy out the wonderful names

photo(76).jpg

I am excited by what this find opens up for my painting. There's so much to explore and discover. For example, the illustrations were taken from Sowerby's English Botany.  James Sowerby studied at the Royal Academy and started his series of 2592 hand-coloured engravings in 1790.

We didn't have access to the internet back in the early 1960s but we were given access to these images through the humble Observer's Book. I hadn't realised the quality of what I was looking at.

I tried out a new direction for recent colour work, based on the Observer's illustrations. The page spreads alternated colour with black-and-white images.

Red Campion -- Sea Sandwort

Red Campion -- Sea Sandwort

 


 

Studio or lab?

One day, an art tutor suggested we think of our studio space as a lab where we could explore our painting. I was appalled at the idea...

I am moving from full-time work researching the linguistics of metaphor to spend more time with art; having a studio is one of the joys I am reaching for. Everyone I know seems to want a lab. Me, I want a studio.

The lab yearning is part of the physics-envy so prevalent in my field – humanities with reliability and null hypotheses; testing poetry; replicated experiments on the meaning of metaphors. All the messy glory of human understanding reduced to numbers.

Cut, cut, slash, slash.

“If we get rid of all this individual superfluous subjectivity, then we’ll understand what it’s about.”

No, you won’t. All you’ll know about is stripped-down, less-than-human puzzle solving.

You won’t know how one man comes to kill another.

You won’t know how a woman’s heart breaks, again. 

You won’t know how I muddle my way through to understanding another person from what they say, from how they look, and from where their eyes move.

You won’t know what happens when my body jerks in recognition of beauty perceived, in a response that moves out from my core. The hesitant wonder in front of the canvas when I make that happen. Those moments of fearful recognition that keep artists going back to the studio. The studio, not the lab.

Where the lab must be kept pristine, germ-free and shiny, the studio accumulates cuttings, images snipped from magazines, jottings on odd bits of card. Pens lie scattered around after their last use. There’s a dried-out rose in a dried-up jam jar – transformed to a new beauty. There are colours on the cloth, on scraps of paper. Colours that recall a finished painting and the emotions it carried. Brushes stand, waiting. Tubes of paint lie, calling. Paintings stalled and speaking. Books open to revisit. Rose petals. 

There’s a poem to be found, a composition to be worked out, shapes to be thought through.

Dance labs, metaphor labs, poetry labs – all longing to be psychology labs, which in turn want to be biology or physics labs, or more lately neuroscience labs. I don’t want a clean, regulated room; a series of trials and tests; hypotheses rejected; data collected. I want a ‘research studio’ where colours and shapes mix with lists of metaphors and patterns of talk. Where possible meanings are tried out as sketches, and thrown or kept. Where paintings are imagined and happen. 

There’s hard work and there’s thorough, skilled work. And there’s enthusiasm, energy and play. There’s uncontrolled chance and happenstance alongside expertise and skills, nourishing and richness. Not the poverty of a lab environment, not an uncontrollable chaos, but a human mess – of the enticing, the interesting, the amazing, the possible, the perhaps – that allows the emergence of beauty, awe and laughter.

Thinking about exhibitions with impact

This week I met with some people in London who are planning an exhibition about peace building in Africa that will use photographs and words from interviews to show an audience the quiet, courageous work being done. It was fascinating to discuss the process of choosing images and words to make an impact on viewers. Here are some of the ideas that I offered for discussion, based on my experience of combining artworks with my empathy research:

  • Because you get very different responses to a set of images from viewers who are artists and from viewers who are not alert to the artistic qualities of the images, it is important to decide early on which audience you are most concerned with and make choices based on that intended audience.
  • My empathy research shows a 'Goldilocks effect'. People do not easily connect with people or images of people that are too forceful or too close. Large photos of people are likely to have this same effect. They also won't connect with anything too far away - physically or metaphorically.
  • There is another response that might come into play for viewers at an exhibition like this - if people feel they are being asked to 'help', they may put up barriers to empathy.
  • The method I use to analyse spoken interviews involves transcribing audio recordings into 'intonation units'. These are stretches of language produced under a single breath. Learning to transcribe this way takes some training and doing it takes time. But the result is a transcription that sometimes looks beautiful and sounds like poetry. Here is a section of a transcription from one of my interviews with a young man in Kenya:

     

    when we started this war
    we started something that we never knew
    and that we have never seen
     
    in that war 
    so many friends
    so many young people 
    died 

     

  • When you select words from what people have told you in an interview in order to present their 'voice' to viewers, you have a responsibility to the interviewee to not misrepresent them - the ethics of exhibiting.

 

Bringing together my art and my research - a new departure

My other work is research - I am an applied linguist, so I collect and examine the words that people say. For the last three years, I have been researching empathy, that's the connection that happens when we see another human being and understand how it is to be them. I have become intrigued by what blocks empathy between people, as much as how empathy works successfully. 

Interestingly, the original idea of empathy first related to art, as German Einfühlung -- feeling into -- to describe how a viewer makes sense emotionally of a painting by feeling into it. There's lots about the research project on The Empathy Blog and technical detail on the project website. What I want to write about here is my increasing need to bring this research closer to my art. The paintings of Kenyan landscapes, for example, are not just landscapes but also memories of the research visit that took me to Kenya and the people I met there, their struggles to stop conflict and live in peace with neighbouring tribes. For me, the images echo with stories and the symbolic distances that violence creates. I am working out ways to communicate these echoes to viewers of the pictures, and also to use the images to make the research more striking.

Below you can see a leaflet that puts images together with words from the data. I'd love to hear your comments and to learn about other ways to do ART + RESEARCH